Trial of Charles I – What were the real objectives?

While the setting, processes and personnel of the trial of Charles I may appear less important than the interchanges between the king and the President of the Court, John Bradshaw, they are critical to revealing the wider purpose of Charles’ trial which was to establish the Commons as the supreme authority in England, as the representative of the sovereign people, the key demand of the radical Leveller movement which had called for the creation of a more democratic representative body, elected on the basis of manhood suffrage.

Investigating the connections of trial participants to radical groupings in both the City of London and the army, strengthens these links between the proceedings and the Levellers’ manifesto. The form of justice that the High Court of Justice pursued was not only radical but also public. The proceedings played out in front of thousands of spectators within Westminster Hall and in print were read by many more. The Rump Parliament intended the trial to serve propaganda purposes. However, this aim was subverted by the king’s surprisingly fluent defence in which he recast himself as a defender of the people’s liberty in the face of a new, arbitrary power.

Listen here

Also available on

The World Turned Upside Down
The World Turned Upside Down - The British Civil Wars 1638-1651
Trial of Charles I - What were the real objectives?
bio copy 3


Ted Vallance

Director of the Graduate School, University of Roehampton

Ted Vallance is Professor of History at the University of Roehampton. He is the author of four books, most recently Loyalty, Memory and Public Opinion in England,…

Read Biography

Learn more

glossary copy 7

Interactive Glossary





maps copy 3


An Act of the Commons of England Assembled in Parliament, for Erecting of a High Court of Justice, for the Trying and Judging of Charles Stuart, King of England
J Kesselring ed.*The Trial of Charles I*(Peterborough, Ontario, 2016)
G. Muddiman,*The Trial of King Charles the First*(London and Glasgow, 1928)